Milios Defense

Seattle DUI & Criminal Defense Attorneys

Open 24/7 – Call or Text
206-745-2371
Email Us

  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Attorneys
      • Tim Milios
    • Free Consultations
    • Legal Fees
    • Domestic Violence Defense
  • Process
    • Jurisdictions
    • Arrest & Processing
    • Arraignment
    • Pretrial Hearing
    • Motions & Evidentiary Hearings
    • Trial
    • Review Hearings
    • Potential Outcomes
      • Record Expungement
      • Quashing Warrants
    • Resources
      • BAC Calculator
      • Glossary
      • Industry Partners
      • Legal Resources
      • WA Court Info
      • WA DOL Info
    • DUI Self Help Guide
      • Alcohol Treatment Evaluations
    • FAQs
  • Penalties
    • DUI Sentencing Grid
      • First Offense DUI
      • Second Offense DUI
      • Third Offense DUI
    • Jail
    • Work Release
    • Fines
    • License Suspension
    • Vehicle Forfeiture
    • Alcohol/Drug Treatment
    • Probation
    • Ignition Interlock
    • Aggravating Sentencing Factors
    • Traveling to Canada
    • Moving to Another State
    • Employment Consequences
    • Immigration Consequences
  • Laws
    • WA State DUI Laws
    • Refusing Breathalyzers
    • Marijuana/Drug DUI
    • Minor DUI
    • Boating DUI
    • Physical Control Laws
    • Other Criminal Traffic Offenses
      • Seattle Reckless Driving Attorney
      • Seattle Reckless Endangerment Attorney
      • Negligent Driving: First Degree (Neg 1)
      • Driving on a Suspended License
      • Seattle Hit and Run Attorney
      • Seattle Vehicular Assault Attorney
      • Seattle Felony DUI Attorney
      • Vehicular Homicide
    • Ignition Interlock Laws
    • Deferred Prosecution
      • Can You Defer Prosecution for a DUI in Washington?
  • DOL
    • DOL Hearing Procedure
    • DOL Hearing Rules
    • License Suspension
    • CDL & DUI
    • SR-22 Insurance
    • Habitual Traffic Offender (HTO)
  • Blog
  • Contact

Hailey’s Law: Alternatively known as the Tow Yard Operator’s Welfare Proviso.

August 22, 2011 by Tim Milios

As of July 22, 2011, police officers making DUI arrests in the State of Washington no longer have the option to leave to person’s vehicle parked where it is or to allow another person to drive the vehicle home. On that date, legislation enacted back in April of 2011 took effect, commanding that the vehicle of a person arrested for DUI in the state of Washington must be towed from the scene and held for a period of 12 hours. Known as Haily’s Law, it was created to ensure that a drunk driver does not return to his or her car and drive following his arrest and release.

The law itself is named for a woman who was seriously injured when struck by a person who had been arrested for DUI, returned to his vehicle upon being released and then drove again despite being commanded not to.  Under the new law, a car is to be towed and held at the yard for the duration of the 12 hour hold. The only exception is that if the registered owner of the vehicle is not the arrested driver, he or she can recover the vehicle at any time. This certainly seems the beg the question, “If the registered owner of the vehicle can be found in the same or less amount of time that it would take a tow truck to respond, why not let the registered owner drive it from the scene?”

Though the outward intent of the law appears admirable, you have to wonder if it really will accomplish what it sets out to.  That is, keeping drunk drivers off the road. How much police man power time will be wasted by officers waiting for a tow truck that could be have been spent on the road searching for the very drivers they purport to protect society from?  Assume a 30 minute wait time for a tow truck.  Given three stops per night per officer, this translates into 90 minutes of down time.  Further assuming that before the law an officer would have only towed 50%  of the vehicles stopped we are left with a 45 wasted minutes per night per officer on average.  How many drivers would have been stopped in that aggregate time over the course of a year?  Would that number be more or less than the number of people who actually return to their car and drive after being arrested for DUI and prohibited from doing so by the arresting officer.

But the tow yard owners are happy.

Categories: Penalties

« 2011 Ignition Interlock Law Addresses Some Concerns, Ignores Others
Website Helps Washington Drivers Decide Where to Drink and Drive »

Recent Posts

  • Many Washington Courts Allowing Zoom Video Hearings During Covid-19 Pandemic June 26, 2020
  • Seattle Municipal Court to Return from Covid-19 Closure, Re-Opening in Phases June 15, 2020
  • Inslee Waives DUI Statute of Limitations During Covid-19 Closure April 15, 2020
  • Alcohol Treatment During COVID-19 State of Emergency March 24, 2020
  • Supreme Court Strikes Down Hailey’s Law as Unconstitutional October 17, 2019

Our Firm

Attorneys
Jurisdictions
Initial Office Consultations
Fees
Contact Us

Resources

Legal Resources
Washington Courts
Department of Licensing
Client Resources

FAQs

The DUI Stop and Arrest
DOL Questions
DUI Penalties
DUI Court Questions

Seattle DUI Attorneys and Lawyers Serving Washington State | P: 206-745-2371 | 1325 Fourth Avenue #170, Seattle, WA 98101
Use of this legal website constitutes acceptance of the Milios Defense Terms of Service. The material on this site is for informational purposes only regarding DUI legal issues, and is not a substitute for legal advice provided by an attorney or lawyer and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. © 2023 Milios Defense, LLP. We want to be your Seattle DUI Attorney. All rights reserved.